Libya and Africa
http://youtu.be/Y6sOrUBYxp8
Reports coming out of Libya, even from the mainstream western media, show that the place is a mess. The result of the NATO intervention has been to set up an ineffectual government that has no democratic mandate and that competes with armed militias. The Channel 4 documentary describes a nation in continued conflict and rife with racist brutality against black Libyans and black migrant workers. It is interesting that although the documentary shows the truth of what is happening the commentary makes many references to the ‘barbarism’ of the Gaddafi regime, asserts that everyone is happy to see Gaddafi gone and repeats the lie that he was using mercenaries against his own people. Perhaps it would not have been possible to make the film without these caveats.
It is very clear that the NATO intervention in Libya was not humanitarian and was based on lies just as the decision to invade Iraq was based on lies. What does this say about David Cameron who with Sarkozy and Obama were central to pursuing the war and pushing for ‘regime change’? What does it say about the ‘loyal opposition’ that did not oppose this?
Dan Glazebrook argues that Gaddafi was a bulwark against US plans to recolonise Africa for the western powers and his elimination means that these plans can go ahead unhindered:
Glazebrook writes:
Libya’s destruction gave AFRICOM a renewed lease on life. The U.S. Africa Command “has now announced an unprecedented fourteen major joint military exercises in African countries for 2012.†Meanwhile, the NATO-created “government†of Libya passed Law 37, which imposes life in prison for “glorifying the former government or its leader,†and Law 38, which immunizes from prosecution all crimes – including lynching and ethic cleansing – committed while “promoting or protecting the revolution.â€
With a threat of life imprisonment for “glorifying the former government or its leader,†it is hardly surprising if reporters find few people speaking well of the previous regime.
Glazebrook’s article, reprinted in Black Agenda Report provides a proper commentary to the Channel 4 Documentary:
“Libyan resources are now being jointly plundered by the oil multinationals and a handful of chosen families from amongst the country’s new elites.â€
The scale of the ongoing tragedy visited on Libya by NATO and its allies is becoming horribly clearer with each passing day. Estimates of those killed so far vary, but 50,000 seems like a low estimate; indeed the British Ministry of Defense was boasting that the onslaught had killed 35,000 as early as last May. But this number is constantly growing. The destruction of the state’s forces by British, French and American blitzkrieg has left the country in a state of total anarchy – in the worst possible sense of the word. Having had nothing to unite them other than a temporary willingness to act as NATO’s foot soldiers, the former “rebels†are now turning on each other. 147 were killed in in-fighting in Southern Libya in a single week earlier this year, and in recent weeks government buildings – including the Prime Ministerial compound – have come under fire by “rebels†demanding cash payment for their services. $1.4billion has been paid out already – demonstrating once again that it was the forces of NATO colonialism, not Gaddafi, who were reliant on “mercenaries†– but payments were suspended last month due to widespread nepotism. Corruption is becoming endemic – a further $2.5billion in oil revenues that was supposed to have been transferred to the national treasury remains unaccounted for. Libyan resources are now being jointly plundered by the oil multinationals and a handful of chosen families from amongst the country’s new elites; a classic neo-colonial stitch-up. The use of these resources for giant infrastructure projects such as the Great Manmade River, and the massive raising of living standards over the past four decades (Libyan life expectancy rose from 51 to 77 since Gaddafi came to power in 1969) sadly looks to have already become a thing of the past.
The rest of Glazebrook’s article describes how:
in the same month Gaddafi was murdered (October 2011) – the US announced it was sending troops to no less than four more African countries – the Central African Republic, Uganda, South Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo. AFRICOM has now announced an unprecedented fourteen major joint military exercises in African countries for 2012.
That the machinations in the Middle East and Africa are part of a plan to maintain the dominance of the West is so obvious that it takes wilful blindness not to see it. The question is, what can ordinary citizens of the UK do individually or collectively?
Tarpley vs Jones
http://youtu.be/FRFwInTsxkk
Alex Jones interviews Webster Tarpley. Jones is a poor interviewer and derides a lot that Tarpley has to say, particularly Tarpley’s criticisms of Ron Paul; nevertheless Tarpley gets his points across.
Tarpley’s command of his subject and his intelligence are obvious. He is sharing his insight into what can be called ‘The Pattern’, the way that events connect to present a picture of a struggle between the 1% who dominate the political system in the west and those nations or alliances that stand in the way of the expansion of their dominance. Listening to him I feel I can begin to understand the pattern.
Quotable
The self-confidence of a warrior is not the self-confidence of the average man. The average man seeks certainty in the eyes of the onlooker and calls that self-confidence. The warrior seeks impeccability in his own eyes and calls that humbleness. The average man is hooked to his fellow men, while the warrior is hooked only to himself. You’re after the self-confidence of the average man, when you should be after the humbleness of a warrior. The difference between the two is remarkable. Self-confidence entails knowing something for sure; humbleness entails being impeccable in one’s actions and feelings. ~ Castenada.
There are some teachers who one level appear “mad, bad or dangerous to know”. Castaneda is certainly amongst these. Also I would count Osho and Stuart Wilde. Maybe David Icke too, Icke is a political ‘conspiracy theorist’ but his work has a strong spiritual dimension. These teachers are exciting, engaging, entertaining, and this is part of their appeal but there is also a depth that seems to come from insight into the Deep Self or Spirit. I wouldn’t count them as gurus by any means. It would be dangerous to follow Osho or Stuart Wilde, at any rate it would be dangerous for me, but there are teachings or rather ideas that have a certain resonance and that I find useful or inspirational.
To return to the Castaneda quote, I think about the meaning of a warrior’s humility for myself. What does impeccability mean? It means to do my best in all dimensions of my life, in thought, attitude, speech and action.
Questions, Quotes and Qualities
The pic is from www.marcandangel.com. I’m posting it for two reasons; the first is to answer it myself and the second is to remind me to use the idea of questions, quotes and qualities illustrated by photos as part of the summer school projects this year.
Oh. To answer the question. I can’t identify a single thing I can do now that I couldn’t do last year. This means I haven’t developed, learned. This year has been a year of stagnation or false starts. There is a certain frustration .. and yet .. and yet there is also a sense of coming to terms with where I am, with my own strengths and weaknesses.
A warrior takes his lot, whatever it may be, and accepts it in ultimate humbleness. He accepts in humbleness what he is, not as grounds for regret but as a living challenge. ~ Castaneda.
My weaknesses are real. Some I am very aware of, others not so much. These weaknesses stand in the way of my progress like an army, each one supporting the others. My challenge is to eliminate them all.
Webster Tarpley
This conversation between Webster Tarpley and Libertarian Adam Kokesh is worth watching. Kokesh has no real answer for Tarpley’s assertion that Ron Paul economic plan would be genocidal. Kokesh also concedes that the libertarian project lacks any plan to correct the existing distribution of wealth. It’s amusing watching Tarpley refusing to be drawn into a theoretical discussion about libertarians versus ‘big government’ and staying focused on what’s actually happening.
Death Squads in Syria
Webster Tarpley says explicitly that US sponsored death squads were responsible for the Houla massacre that is being used to undermine the Assad government in Syria. He does not present any independent evidence for this assertion but as far as I can see there is no independent evidence for the assertion that the massacre was perpetrated on orders from the Syrian government or even by their supporters.
The US, UK and France are very insistent that Assad should step down, as they were insistent that Gaddafi should step down in Libya. The whole drive seems to be ‘regime change’ rather than the resolution of a humanitarian crisis. It is difficult not to see a ‘conspiracy’ to take over the Middle East, especially given the testimony of US General Wesley Clark:
http://youtu.be/9RC1Mepk_Sw

