Kim Jong-il
Kim Jong-il the North Korean leader is dead. But what sort of society reacts with this kind of regimented grief?
Kim Jong-il the North Korean leader is dead. But what sort of society reacts with this kind of regimented grief?
It occurred to me today that there were parallels between the Gaddafi legend and what I remember of the story of Paul Muad’dib in Frank Herbert’s novels, Dune and Dune Messiah. Wondering if this thought had occurred to anyone else I googled ‘Muad’dib and Gaddafi’ and sure enough others had made the connection (the Internet is truly amazing ), someone had even gone to the trouble of making a video:
!!! Muad’Dib Al Gaddafi !!! from UN_ilateral on Vimeo.
There several others videos that present this picture of the supposed madman as a visionary hero:
Compare that with this video:
It seem beyond dispute that the NATO intervention was at best wrong headed and disproportionate in its violence and at worst a cynical and murderous corporate takeover. What is problematic however is the matter of Gaddafi’s legends and legacy. There are two competing pictures, one of Gaddafi as a kind of James Bond villain and another of him as a near Messiah. The truth may lie in some complex interweaving of the legends but which legend becomes established is important because it will have totemic value for those who are for and those who are against the US strategy for ‘full spectrum dominance‘ and the establishment of a world corporate state.
James Fetzer has written an interesting article, Reason and Rationality in Public Debate: The Case of Libya, which sets the stage for a rational assessment of Gaddafi’s legends and legacy.
Related Links:
Spotted this video. It’s interesting from a human point of view. There is little in the news about Libya and some suspect that this is because all is not going well as far as the TNC’s control is concerned. There are a number of vying factions and a pro Gadaffi resistance. Gadaffi’s son Saif was captured and is still held by one faction in November. What’s interesting here is his interaction with his captors; he is clearly a charismatic man who has established a rapport with the men he is speaking with. His body language, words and tone convey openness and sincerity.
Saif also appears sincere in this earlier interview where he admits that many mistakes were made by the Gaddafi regime.
Untitled from harisgr on Vimeo.
‘Inside Job’ provides insight into how irresponsible, unethical and illegal practices in the financial sector led to the global economic crisis of 2008. The documentary focuses on Wall Street but I’m pretty sure a lot of this applies to London.
Robert Fisk draws a parallel between the protests against Arab dictators and the Occupy protests against the financial dictators in the west:
The protest movements are indeed against Big Business – a perfectly justified cause – and against “governments”. What they have really divined, however, albeit a bit late in the day, is that they have for decades bought into a fraudulent democracy: they dutifully vote for political parties – which then hand their democratic mandate and people’s power to the banks and the derivative traders and the rating agencies, all three backed up by the slovenly and dishonest coterie of “experts” from America’s top universities and “think tanks”, who maintain the fiction that this is a crisis of globalisation rather than a massive financial con trick foisted on the voters.
The banks and the rating agencies have become the dictators of the West. Like the Mubaraks and Ben Alis, the banks believed – and still believe – they are owners of their countries. The elections which give them power have – through the gutlessness and collusion of governments – become as false as the polls to which the Arabs were forced to troop decade after decade to anoint their own national property owners.
Source: The Independent.
The film, and Fisk’s article, made me wonder why David Cameron is so keen on defending the financial sector and why the media seems to believe that he is wiser than all the other EU leaders .. actually they seem to like that he is ‘being tough’ but don’t know why (I listen to LBC a lot). Anyway I found some interesting thoughts on this blog: gregpytel.blogspot.com
Source: The Telegraph
Reporting from Washington— The Obama administration has sent a formal diplomatic request asking Iran to return the radar-evading drone aircraft that crashed on a CIA spying mission this month, but U.S. officials say they don’t expect Iran will comply.
“We have asked for it back,” Obama said Monday at a news conference in Washington with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Maliki. “We’ll see how the Iranians respond.”
Source: LA Times.
The US cannot seriously expect Iran to return their spy plane but they are too arrogant to be embarrassed by having been caught spying; they present it as their right and themselves as being above international and moral law.
This testimony is exceptional. It suggests that the NATO assault on Libya was a tragedy not only for the Libyan people but for Africans and for the world.
Links:
‎”Dictatorship nations are outlaws. Any free nation had the right to invade Nazi Germany and, today, has the right to invade Soviet Russia, Cuba or any other slave pen. Whether a free nation chooses to do so or not is a matter of its own self-interest, not of respect for the non-existent “rights” of gang rulers.”
[Ayn Rand ~ The Virtue of Selfishness]
I don’t agree of course. Just thinking that maybe there’s a principle like this behind the NATO wars.
Rand also defines what she means by ‘dictatorship’:
“There are four characteristics which brand a country unmistakably as a dictatorship: one-party rule–executions without trial or with a mock trial, for political offenses–the nationalization or expropriation of private property–and censorship. A country guilty of these outrages forfeits any moral prerogatives, any claim to national rights or sovereignty, and becomes an outlaw.”
[Ayn Rand ~ The Virtue of Selfishness]
Execution without trial? Glenn Greenwald of Salon writes about the September assassination of Anwar al-Awlaki:
It was first reported in January of last year that the Obama administration had compiled a hit list of American citizens whom the President had ordered assassinated without any due process, and one of those Americans was Anwar al-Awlaki. No effort was made to indict him for any crimes (despite a report last October that the Obama administration was “considering†indicting him). Despite substantial doubt among Yemen experts about whether he even had any operational role in Al Qaeda, no evidence (as opposed to unverified government accusations) was presented of his guilt. When Awlaki’s father sought a court order barring Obama from killing his son, the DOJ argued, among other things, that such decisions were “state secrets†and thus beyond the scrutiny of the courts. He was simply ordered killed by the President: his judge, jury and executioner. When Awlaki’s inclusion on President Obama’s hit list was confirmed, The New York Times noted that “it is extremely rare, if not unprecedented, for an American to be approved for targeted killing.â€
One Party Rule? It is a prejudice to suppose that two parties dominated by the same ruling class is more responsive to the will of the people than a one party system. We have to look at levels of participation in the political process.
People are sometimes scared of David Icke because he is regarded as crazy but I think this video shows that he is an engaging speaker who is informed and informative even if we don’t go along with all of his assertions. Here he shows how the power to create money has created the power dynamic a minuscule number of people or families control the world. The Occupy movement calls them the 1%. Icke argues that they are manufacturing the financial crisis in order to consolidate power, that their agenda includes having a world bank, a world government and a world army.
Mohamad Mahathir, former prime minister of Malayasia, sounds like a rare example of an enlightened politician.
Michael Jackson produced some nice ‘theme songs’ for protest/resistance: