Skip to content
Inner Quests
  • Home
  • Personal
    • Cool Runnings
    • General Notes
    • Health and Healing
      • Health Foods or Fads?
    • Teachers and Teachings
  • Resources
  • Extraordinary People
  • Search Icon

Inner Quests

Naomi Wolf Article

Naomi Wolf Article

April 9, 2012 gavin.sealey Comments 0 Comment

The article ‘How the US uses sexual humiliation as a political tool to control the masses‘ by Naomi Wolf in the Guardian strikes me as particularly important. I commented on Facebook that:

A lot of people recognise that the US is far from being a benign force in the world (British understatement) but I’m not sure we are acknowledging how malign US global and domestic policy is. While Naomi Wolf’s article is about the US it should be clear from recent news stories in the UK that the ideal of an ‘open society’ (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_society) is under attack here also.

The first paragraph of Wolf’s article reads:

In a five-four ruling this week, the supreme court decided that anyone can be strip-searched upon arrest for any offense, however minor, at any time. This horror show ruling joins two recent horror show laws: the NDAA, which lets anyone be arrested forever at any time, and HR 347, the “trespass bill”, which gives you a 10-year sentence for protesting anywhere near someone with secret service protection. These criminalizations of being human follow, of course, the mini-uprising of the Occupy movement.

The rest of the article shows a US that is well on the way to totalitarianism.

Given Naomi Wolf’s liberal and establishment credentials this article mainstreams what so called ‘conspiracy theorists’ like Alex Jones and David Icke have been saying for years i.e. that the power elites are profoundly evil and actively enjoy the humiliation and enslavement of what they see as the lower classes. Wolf rightly sees the Occupy Movement and open communication on the Internet as threatening the establishment’s control of perception and political initiative. What she is describing however is not a new phenomenon; this oppression has always existed but it is now threatening people who imagined themselves safe, who believed that they were part of the establishment. Still some good may come of it; a conservative is a liberal who hasn’t been strip searched yet.

Perfect Economy

Perfect Economy

April 3, 2012 gavin.sealey Comments 0 Comment

The Perfect Economy website looks interesting. Not really looked into it in any depth but want to do so.

Sound Cloud

Sound Cloud

April 3, 2012 gavin.sealey Comments 0 Comment

This is the music that the Plum Village monastics performed on Saturday. I’m posting it mostly because Sound Cloud looks like a useful audio resource.

Farm to Fridge

Farm to Fridge

April 1, 2012 gavin.sealey Comments 2 comments

http://youtu.be/6ultv1xI9uY

This deserves/needs to go viral. It took me a while to repost this to Facebook because it took me a while to watch this video all the way through and I didn’t want to repost it until I had done so. It is unpleasant and painful to watch. It focuses on the farm industry in America but I would expect that some of the same abuses happen in the UK. I do not eat ‘red meat’ and only eat free range poultry (rarely) and fish; I also consume milk and free range eggs often choosing the organic option. I have to question these choices. I am not against killing and eating animals but I am against cruelty. Death and the consumption of animals by other animals as part of the food chain is part of the natural order but the mechanisation of slaughter and the sustained torture of animals is not part of that order. Everything is connected, our acceptance of cruelty towards animals makes cruelty towards humans more acceptable, turning a blind eye to this suffering is contiguous with us turning a blind eye towards massive injustice and suffering in the human world. As we evolve individually and collectively to becoming more conscious we need to open our eyes to the reality and consequences of what we do and accept.

Thay at Trafalgar Square

Thay at Trafalgar Square

April 1, 2012 gavin.sealey Comments 0 Comment

People were already sitting when I arrived at Trafalgar Square at 2pm on Saturday, yesterday.. 31st March.

I unfolded my mats and sat cross legged just glad to be there. Had I arrived ten minutes later there would have been nowhere left to sit in the Square, at least nowhere with a view of the stage. The event started precisely on time as Big Ben chimed the half hour at 2.30pm.

Thich Nath Hanh (Thay) started with a meditation based on the breath ‘Breathing in, enjoy the in breath .. breathing out enjoy the out breath’. ‘Breathing in see yourself as a flower .. a child is a flower, the child’s hand a flower, the child’s foot a flower .. breathing out see yourself as a flower, fresh’. ‘breathing in see yourself as a mountain, solid, reliable .. breathing out see yourself as a mountain’. Breathing in see yourself as a body of water, reflecting things as they are .. breathing out see yourself as a body of water’.

Thay then shared four mantras with us. he said there was no need to say them in Sanskrit. The mantras are:

“Darling, I am there for you.”

“Darling, I know you are there and I do not know what I would do without you.”

“Darling, I know you suffer, that is why I am there for you.”

He said that the fourth mantra was difficult but had to be used sometimes, when you feel that the person closest to you has hurt you in some way. Then you say:

“Darling, I am suffering and I need you to help me.”

Sometimes instead of acknowledging out pain to the one we love we say to ourselves that we don’t need that person, we can live without them.

Thay then told a story of a misunderstanding. It is a story he often uses and I found a retelling of it on Dhammatalks.net.

In many cases, because of our wrong perceptions, we suffer. When we suffer, we put the blame on somebody else, just as in the story of the woman called Nam Xuong. She was pregnant, but her husband had to go into the army. When he came back from the army, the child was already three years old. This was the first time that he had seen his child. He asked his wife to go to the market and buy offerings for the ancestral altar. While his wife was out, he said to the little boy, “Why don’t you call me Daddy?” The little boy said, “You’re not my daddy. My daddy comes every night and sometimes my mommy cries with my daddy, and often my mother talks to my daddy a whole hour. When my mommy sits down, my daddy sits down, and when my mommy lies down, my daddy lies down.”

When the husband heard this he thought that his wife had been unfaithful, and when she came back from the market he didn’t want to look at her. When everything was prepared on the altar to the ancestors, he touched the earth before the ancestors, but he didn’t allow his wife to touch the earth in front of the ancestors, because he thought that if she had been unfaithful to him, she has betrayed the ancestors, and therefore she should not prostrate in front of them. And his wife suffered a great deal. Why did her husband not look at her? Why did her husband not allow her to prostrate? Why did he roll up the mat and not allow her to prostrate? Why didn’t he stay to have the celebration meal after coming home? Why did he go to the wine bar and get drunk, and come back at three o’clock? And why did he get up in the early morning and go out and get drunk again? His wife suffered so much that she could not stand it any more, and so she went and jumped into the river and killed herself.

When the husband heard that his wife had died, he came home to look after the little boy, and that night, when he lit the lamp, the child shouted out: “Mister, Mister, Daddy’s come—here he is!” And the boy pointed to the shadow of his father on the wall. Then he understood that every night while he was away in the army, his wife would light the lamp, and she would talk to her shadow on the wall. She would say, “You’ve been away so long. You’ve been away many years. How can I bring our child up on my own?” And she would cry. The reason she had done this was that one day the child had come home and said: “Where’s my daddy? Other children have daddies—where’s my daddy?” His mother had pointed to the shadow on the wall and said, “Look, that’s your daddy. You can talk to him, if you like.” Therefore, when the husband came home, and the child said, “My father comes every night, my mother talks to my father every night, when my mother sits down, my father sits down,” that was the truth, the truth of a child. But the husband had a wrong perception, and he had a big suspicion of his wife, thinking she was unfaithful, and he had an internal formation, and he couldn’t transform that internal formation.

Out of his suffering he made his wife suffer too, because he did not talk to her. Therefore, his wife, being treated in this terrible way, couldn’t do anything but kill herself. If the wife had known what she was doing, she would have come to her husband and said, “My dear, it’s so strange. You were so happy when you first came home, but when I came home from the market you had changed completely—you wouldn’t look at me, you wouldn’t talk to me. What have I done to cause you to be like this?” If she had said that, then the husband would have explained. He would have said, “Our child says that a man comes every night, and you weep with him, you talk to him, and when he sits down, you sit down, when he lies down, you lie down. Tell me, what’s this about? If he had said that, then his wife would have had an opportunity to explain, but he had such a great arrogance and pride, such self-pride. He had two internal formations, the internal formation of suspicion, and the internal formation of pride.

It was not only the fault of the husband, it was not only the fault of the wife, it was the fault of both of them that they suffered so much. The husband thought my wife is unfaithful, she is not worthy of the ancestors. He did not know that he should not believe in his perception. Why did he not go to the wife and ask her directly, “My dear, when you went to the market I was talking to our child, and he said that someone comes every night, and that you make the child call that man ‘Father.’ If you can’t explain this I don’t want to live.” And then she would have had an opportunity to explain, and husband and wife could have been happy again. We all have pride. We all suffer. Both of them had pride, and because of their pride, they could not resolve the internal formations, and the tragedy happened. So wrong perception plays a very important role in bringing about suffering between two people. It makes the communication between two people come to and end. When we suffer, when we’re angry, we have to have the capacity to ask, is my perception wrong or not? We should always ask ourselves: “Is my perception correct?”

Thay is unquestionably a great teacher. His style is gentle and simple. It was a pleasure and privilege to be there.

Sunlight , Vitamin D and Cancers

Sunlight , Vitamin D and Cancers

March 26, 2012 gavin.sealey Comments 0 Comment

Health Ranger says that sunlight and vitamin D prevent many cancers. Dark skinned people need lots more exposure to the sun to build up their vitamin D. Intuitively this makes sense. I should definitely be getting my light rays for the sun rather than a computer screen

System Image Restore Problems

System Image Restore Problems

March 26, 2012 gavin.sealey Comments 1 comment

Was trying to repair my main computer which is considerably better than the replacement I’ve been using. Specifically I was installing a new hard drive to replace the corrupt one that keeps crashing. This involves restoring a system image that I had created earlier; I tried to do this but the system did not recognise my backup. I looked for a solution on the web but haven’t been able to find one so far. I however did find a good description of the problem:

I am trying to restore a backup system image to my repaired PC. It is wiped clean. I have the “Repair Disc Windows 7 64 Bit” that I created in Windows 7. Using Windows 7 Backup I have a system image backup on an external WD Essentiasl 1TB USB Hard Drive.
I insert the Repair Disc and start the system. Get to System Recoevery Options. I have the external Hard Disk with the system backup image connected. Select System Image Recovery option. Says “Windows cannot find a system image on this computer. Attach the backup hard disk or insert the final DVD from a bckup set and click retry. Alternatively, close this dialog for more options. Retry gives me the same message. Tried starting with drive attached, not attached, same result. Click cancel.
Next option selected is “Select a system image.” No system image listed. Hit refresh, still nothing. Top of screen says “Click Advanced to add a network location or install a driver for a backup device if it does not show up in the list below.” I click on the Advanced tab. Option to “Search for a system image on the network” or “Install a driver.” I select install a driver. Find the right driver for the WD Essential hard drive (disk.sys and partmgr.sys) and when I click on them I get “The specified location does not contain information about your hardware.” Click OK. Can’t find how to load these drivers I am being asked for.
Funny thing is that on the screen where I search for driver I can see the WD Essential Hard Drive connected to the system. I can also see the system image files but when I click on them I get the same error message, “The specified location does not contain information about your hardware.”
Please HELP. This is very frustrating!!!

Sea of Distraction

Sea of Distraction

March 24, 2012 gavin.sealey Comments 0 Comment

I got the map from dailyinfographic.com via a scoop.it post to Facebook from Adelina Silva’s scoop.it page. I like fantasy maps and concept maps so this is great. Picturing networks of online communities as a world is entirely appropriate. The prominence of Facebook is not surprising.

Interestingly or ironically my chancing on this was through my following Adelina’s link to an article from eduweek.org which re-asks the old question as to whether new technology helps or hinders learning:

When the Internet burst onto the scene, some thought it would change education by allowing students to access information far beyond classrooms and school libraries. But this access came with a challenge—students were faced with hyperlinked text that sent them into distracting territory.

The problem of being distracted while learning is personally relevant. It’s what I do. Following one learning path I’m led down several others that are tangential to my original intention. This personal habit long pre-dates the advent of hyperlinks, going back to college days when I would browse through the library making connections that were more interesting that the reading necessary to get the essays answered quickly and effectively. This is a habit that I’ve taken into the rest of my life and that has been intensified by the Internet.

The Internet is both a sea of knowledge and a sea of distraction. It is possible to be lost for hours and days to no productive purpose. There are treasures found but also lots of dross and even the treasure will be too much to carry. What we need to practice is not so much the art of navigating to the objects of original purpose, but the art of limiting the time spent on journeys or side trips of serendipitous discovery.

Why am I on Twitter?

Why am I on Twitter?

March 23, 2012 gavin.sealey Comments 0 Comment

According to this chart from flowtown.com I shouldn’t be using Twitter. I rarely post and rarely check Twitter for posts for people/organisations I’m supposedly ‘following’.

Admittedly there’s usually something of interest to click on when I do look but is this enough? In itself no but perhaps there is another potential to Twitter inherent in it being part of an ‘information stream’. Using Twitter is or can be stepping into that stream becoming part of an instant zeitgeist.

Whether anyone sees my post is irrelevant. It takes no time to post. I will post a link to this reflection on Twitter and Facebook by just clicking a couple of icons. Most people who ‘follow’ me of Twitter or are friend on Facebook will not see this, fewer will read it. Never mind it’s just being thrown out there into the Stream (note the capitalisation).

Maybe there’s an insight of sorts here. Twitter, Facebook and our other many-to-many communication media have become a communications Stream and we can choose to contribute to that.

According to the diagram most of us should get off Twitter and I would right now if I took myself or Twitter more seriously. I don’t. What I possibly take seriously is the notion that all this is part of a social evolution and that Twitter, Facebook, blogs and the rest form a collectively authored whole that has value because of its inclusiveness as much as for any creative worth that can be found in individual contributions. Whereas once the majority were denied the opportunity to contribute to art and literature because of our mediocrity we are now contributing to, not just a magnum opus but to THE Magnum Opus.

Not a Lone Nut

Not a Lone Nut

March 23, 2012 gavin.sealey Comments 0 Comment

Justin Raimondo’s article Robert Bales – Lone Nut or Scapegoat challenges the official US story that the massacre of 17 Afghan civilians, mostly children was carried out by a single rogue soldier. This account is disputed by Afghan villagers and Raimondo raises other questions that appear to undermine it.

Apart from the discussion of this particular massacre what is instructive about Raimondo’s article is his reference to an article about ‘night raids’ from a Pakistani source discussing the hostility of Afghans towards the occupiers:

By far the biggest single factor, other than the desecration of the Quran that has contributed to the public dismay and hostility towards the foreign forces, is the most despicable practice of night raids. The method employed is simple: Identify those who provide financial support or protection to the militants. And those who even have sympathies with them. Constitute teams which would go to the houses so identified, knock at the door and as soon as the wanted man appears, shoot him dead. At times a substitute is killed who may be a guest in the house but was unlucky to greet the intruders at the door. On an average about 50 night raids take place daily. And every night about 25 people are killed in cold blood in different parts of the country.

The abominable practice of night raids was introduced by that much trumpeted and widely acclaimed head of the US forces Gen Stanley McChrystal. The idea was to save US ammunition and soldiers on the one hand and to eliminate all those who show any inclination to support the resistance. The assassination of targeted persons in cold blood is an insidious innovation in counterinsurgency. McChrystal’s successor Gen David Petraeus continued this cowardly programme that has become an entrenched tool of policy in counter-terrorism.

This is no different from behaviour we associate with the Nazis. Raimondo suggests that the massacrer attributed to Bales is contiguous with US policy in Afghanistan. Whether perpetrated by Bales on his own or as part of a unit this is not in essence different from what US soldiers are expected to do.

The practice of ‘night raids’ was news to me but the criminality of US global policy is not news to anyone. And yet the mainstream media contributes to present that policy as somehow reasonable.

American soldiers like Jon Turner in this video openly admit to murder. They don’t have to worry about being prosecuted in US courts however because of the implicit sanction for their acts. Soldiers like Turner have no excuse for their crimes but I have to respect honest repentance and must consider them less guilty that the politicians who sent them to kill.

I find it difficult to believe that politicians and the media are unaware of the nature of the wars being fought. That they can still talk of sending soldiers to ‘defend their country’ when they are being sent as aggressors to kill people who are defending their own country. There is a disconnect between the reality of being the aggressor and the myth that the US and British soldiers going to Iraq or Afghanistan are bravely doing their duty ‘defending our country’. This video of Prince Harry neatly encapsulates that myth.

The enemy are faceless and voiceless, they are always Taliban, not Afghans, as though the Taliban rather that the NATO forces were the alien entity. The battle is uneven with the Taliban being vastly overmatched by NATO forces who deploy tanks, artillery and air power against an enemy using hand weapons. The demonisation of the Taliban is perhaps contiguous with a demonisation of Islam which makes it possible for public consciousness in the US/UK to see injustice against Taliban/Afghans/Muslims as somehow justified. This is illustrated by this video of an anti Muslim demonstration in California 2011:

Bales may or may not have been along in perpetrating a particular massacre but he was not alone in in being violently deluded.

Posts navigation

OLDER POSTS
NEWER POSTS

Archives

  • October 2019
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • October 2015
  • June 2015
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • May 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011

Categories

  • 911
  • Adventures
  • Afghanistan
  • Africa
  • Aikido
  • Alex Jones
  • Animation
  • Art
  • Artisteer
  • backups
  • Buddhism
  • Cancer
  • Capitalism
  • Cartoons
  • Chi
  • Chomsky
  • Christianity
  • Consciousness
  • Conspiracy
  • Cynthia McKinney
  • Diaspora
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Enabled
  • Enlightenment
  • Environment
  • Exemplary Websites
  • Extraordinary People
  • Facebook
  • family
  • Film
  • Gaddafi
  • Game Creation
  • Games
  • Hardware Issues
  • Healing
  • Health
  • History
  • Holidays
  • Human Rights
  • Icke
  • Ideas
  • Images
  • Imagination
  • Inedia
  • Inspiration
  • Iraq
  • Islam
  • Israel
  • Joomla
  • Journalism
  • Libya
  • Media
  • Middle East
  • Music
  • Netstorms
  • NYPO
  • Occupy
  • Online Security
  • Open Source
  • Palestine
  • Paranormal
  • People
  • Personal
  • Personal Development
  • Philosophy
  • Poetry
  • Politics
  • Projects
  • Propaganda
  • Putin
  • Quotable
  • Race
  • Religion
  • Resources
  • Ron Paul
  • Running
  • Russia
  • Scepticism
  • Science
  • Socialism
  • Society
  • Spirit
  • SSH
  • Syria
  • Tai Chi and Qi Gong
  • Technology
  • The Field
  • Tolle
  • Travel
  • UK
  • Ukraine
  • Uncategorized
  • USA
  • War
  • Web Dev
  • Webster Tarpley
  • Wing Chun
  • WordPress
  • Writing
  • x-files
  • Yoga
© 2026   All Rights Reserved.